From 95f74e99982edc8750858ff9400048c3d6f07e81 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Damyan Ivanov <dam+mobileledger@ktnx.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 00:10:46 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] fix storing transaction accounts (bad typo)

this is the fastest storage approach, next thing to try -- compare
existing records with the new-to-be and avoid the db update alltogether
if they are the same
---
 .../main/java/net/ktnx/mobileledger/dao/TransactionDAO.java    | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/src/main/java/net/ktnx/mobileledger/dao/TransactionDAO.java b/app/src/main/java/net/ktnx/mobileledger/dao/TransactionDAO.java
index 9c3f21f2..9012d489 100644
--- a/app/src/main/java/net/ktnx/mobileledger/dao/TransactionDAO.java
+++ b/app/src/main/java/net/ktnx/mobileledger/dao/TransactionDAO.java
@@ -170,8 +170,7 @@ public abstract class TransactionDAO extends BaseDAO<Transaction> {
                     trAccDao.getByOrderNoSync(trAcc.getTransactionId(), trAcc.getOrderNo());
             if (existingAcc != null) {
                 existingAcc.copyDataFrom(trAcc);
-                trAccDao.updateSync(trAcc);
-                trAcc = existingAcc;
+                trAccDao.updateSync(existingAcc);
             }
             else
                 trAcc.setId(trAccDao.insertSync(trAcc));
-- 
2.39.5