holder.vTrailer.setVisibility(View.GONE);
LedgerTransaction tr = item.getTransaction();
- // Log.d("transactions", String.format("Filling position %d with %d accounts", position,
+ // debug("transactions", String.format("Filling position %d with %d accounts", position,
// tr.getAccounts().size()));
TransactionLoader loader = new TransactionLoader();
loader.executeOnExecutor(AsyncTask.THREAD_POOL_EXECUTOR,
- new TransactionLoaderParams(tr, holder, position, Data.accountFilter.get(),
+ new TransactionLoaderParams(tr, holder, position, Data.accountFilter.getValue(),
item.isOdd()));
// WORKAROUND what seems to be a bug in CardHolder somewhere
@NonNull
@Override
public TransactionRowHolder onCreateViewHolder(@NonNull ViewGroup parent, int viewType) {
-// Log.d("perf", "onCreateViewHolder called");
+// debug("perf", "onCreateViewHolder called");
View row = LayoutInflater.from(parent.getContext())
.inflate(R.layout.transaction_list_row, parent, false);
return new TransactionRowHolder(row);
@Override
public int getItemCount() {
- return Data.transactions.size() + 1;
+ return Data.transactions.size();
}
enum LoaderStep {HEAD, ACCOUNTS, DONE}
private static class TransactionLoader
int rowIndex = 0;
for (LedgerTransactionAccount acc : tr.getAccounts()) {
-// Log.d(c.getAccountName(), acc.getAmount()));
+// debug(c.getAccountName(), acc.getAmount()));
publishProgress(new TransactionLoaderStep(p[0].holder, acc, rowIndex++,
p[0].boldAccountName));
}
LedgerTransactionAccount acc = step.getAccount();
-// Log.d("tmp", String.format("showing acc row %d: %s %1.2f", rowIndex,
+// debug("tmp", String.format("showing acc row %d: %s %1.2f", rowIndex,
// acc.getAccountName(), acc.getAmount()));
String boldAccountName = step.getBoldAccountName();
holder.tableAccounts.getChildCount() - accCount);
}
-// Log.d("transactions",
+// debug("transactions",
// String.format("Position %d fill done", step.getPosition()));
}
}